I came across this debate happening in philosophy of science on the use of AI in scientific research. The topics within the debate are interesting, but the debate itself is also interesting in how it illustrates the robustness of discourse on science.
Original:
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02691728.2023.2286253
Response:
Response to the response:
Response to the response to the response:
Professor at George Washington University
I am a Professor with Human-Technology Collaboration and Educational Technology programs at George Washington University in Washington DC. I have written 12 books and more than 100 articles, and I co-host of the Parsing Science podcast where scientists tell the stories behind their research. I am also the developer of the WeShareScience.com online platform for sharing research videos, and SciencePods.com where researchers can create free podcasts about their science. My research interests include human interactions with intelligent machines, needs, needs assessments, and instructional design.
Latest posts by Ryan Watkins (see all)
- Neural and Cognitive Impacts of AI: The Influence of Task Subjectivity on Human-LLM Collaboration - June 5, 2025
- From Lived Experience to Insight: Unpacking the Psychological Risks of Using AI Conversational Agents - May 30, 2025
- Leveraging Dual Process Theory in Language Agent Framework for Real-time Simultaneous Human-AI Collaboration - May 29, 2025