We propose that individuals mistakenly interpret their success in predicting an event as an indication that they understand the underlying mechanism or process. In four experiments, we demonstrate this prediction-comprehension bias (PCB) and identify three factors that contribute to it: The feedback participants receive about their prediction accuracy (Experiment 1), the consistency with which an effect follows from a cause (Experiment 2), and the fluency of an observation brought about by its repetition (Experiment 3). In Experiment 4, we investigate an underlying mechanism: reverse inference. Respondents use the perceived validity of inferring prediction from comprehension (a reasonable inference) as an indicator that they can make the reverse inference (i.e., inferring comprehension from prediction, which is less reasonable).
|
Latest posts by Ryan Watkins (see all)
- Experimental Evidence That Conversational Artificial Intelligence Can Steer Consumer Behavior Without Detection - September 28, 2024
- Don’t be Fooled: The Misinformation Effect of Explanations in Human-AI Collaboration - September 20, 2024
- Implementing New Technology in Educational Systems - September 19, 2024