Abstract
To understand how human experiences emerge, change and are interlinked requires understanding which conditions are necessary for thoughts, feelings and behaviors. Linear models which are currently the default for statistical analyses in psychological research do not allow to approach this question directly. Necessary conditional analysis as recently introduced by Dul (2016) can supplement linear models to better understand the necessary conditions for various human experiences. The aim of this work is to familiarize researchers in the area of psychological science with this data-analytic approach. To that end, I illustrate the concept of necessary conditions and separate it from sufficient conditions before I outline the central ideas behind necessary condition analysis. Using an empirical example in the theoretical framework of Self-Determination Theory, I then illustrate step by step, how a necessary conditions analysis can be conducted in R and how the results of this analysis can be interpreted. Limitations of this approach and future directions for the development of necessary condition analysis are discussed.
▲ Professor, George Washington University
www.WeShareScience.com (an online video science fair – down for upgrades)
www.NeedsAssessment.org (all things needs assessment)
Your workday may not be the same as my workday, so please respond during your workday.
- Learning activities in technology-enhanced learning: A systematic review of meta-analyses and second-order meta-analysis in higher education - April 29, 2024
- Legal Aspects for Software Developers Interested in Generative AI Applications - April 28, 2024
- Large Language Models are as persuasive as humans, but how? About the cognitive effort and moral-emotional language of LLM arguments - April 24, 2024